Danny Sullivan, Google’s Search Liaison, has confirmed that the search engine has not implemented any algorithmic actions aimed at addressing site reputation abuse. This statement aims to clarify speculation within the SEO community regarding recent declines in traffic, which some had attributed to Google’s previously announced policy update.
Sullivan Says No Update Rolled Out
Lily Ray, an SEO professional, recently shared a screenshot on Twitter revealing a notable decrease in traffic for the website Groupon starting from May 6. Ray implied that this decline could be indicative of Google implementing algorithmic penalties for sites breaching the company’s site reputation abuse policy.
However, Danny Sullivan swiftly intervened, asserting:
“We have not initiated any algorithmic actions targeting site reputation abuse. I anticipate that if and when we do, we’ll provide clear communication about it. Changes in search results occur regularly for various reasons, and not necessarily due to this.”
Sullivan emphasized that when these actions are enacted, they will only affect specific content rather than entire websites.
This distinction is crucial as it suggests that even if certain pages within a site face manual penalties, the remainder of the domain can maintain normal ranking positions.
Background On Google’s Site Reputation Abuse Policy
Earlier in the year, Google unveiled a fresh policy aimed at tackling what it terms as “site reputation abuse.” This concept pertains to instances where third-party content is published on reputable domains with minimal oversight or engagement from the hosting site.
Instances of this include sponsored posts, advertorials, and partner content that is loosely connected or unrelated to the primary purpose of the site.
With the introduction of this new policy, Google is implementing manual interventions against offending pages and intends to integrate algorithmic detection methods in the future.
What This Means For Publishers & SEOs
Although Google hasn’t rolled out any algorithmic updates concerning site reputation abuse, publishers are on edge due to the possibility of manual actions.
Those heavily dependent on sponsored content or partner posts for traffic should conduct site audits to eliminate any potential policy breaches.
Sullivan’s confirmation about the absence of algorithmic changes might offer temporary reassurance. Yet, it’s a stark reminder that significant ranking fluctuations can arise unexpectedly due to diverse factors, not solely tied to policy updates.
Original news from SearchEngineJournal